Primer on Christian Reconstruction and Postmillennialism

By Dave Haigler* – Feb. 2, 2005

 

This is in reply to the article, "The Covert Kingdom - Thy Will be Done, On Earth as It is in Texas," by JOE BAGEANT.  It was published in the May 25, 2004, issue of CounterPunch, “America’s Best Political Newsletter,” of Out of Bounds Magazine, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558:  http://www.counterpunch.org/bageant05252004.html.  

Let's call mine, "Primer on Christian Reconstruction and Postmillennialism."

Mr. Bageant's piece has more wind than light.  He lumps several religious groups together for ridicule.  These groups share more dissimilarities than commonalities.  For those who will not take the time to read his article, let me say he criticizes such believers as the Pentecostals, Bible Baptists, “conservative and charismatic Christians,” “evangelical born-again Christians,” fundamentalists like those living in Iraq or Syria, “with whom they share approximately the same Bronze Age religious tenets,” believers in “Armageddon and The Rapture,” believers in “Christian Reconstructionism and Dominionism,” the “charismatic movement,” people who allegedly believe that the “Bible infallibility should be enforced upon all other people,”  students of “Jerry Fallwell's [sic] Liberty University,” people from the Pat Robertson School of Government, believers in "Confederate Christian values," readers of “the Left Behind series” -- lumping them all together as “ignorant, intolerant voters called ‘the religious right’," the “strategists  whose ‘stealth ideology’ managed the takeover of the Republican Party in the early 1990s.”  Bageant’s stated goal is for the rest of us to understand these religious types so we can understand American politics.  I use quotes liberally, folks, because like Dave Barry I want you to know I’m not making this up.   And I hate to be read as a tacky, stuffy academic, but if you’re gonna knock Jerry Falwell, just, please, learn how to spell his name correctly.

But first, my credentials to speak write on this.  I am not a senior editor at any kind of History Group.  I got a bachelor's and a law degree, but didn't learn any of this there.

First of all, I'm a liberal-leaning Democratic county chair in Abilene, Texas, who cringes anytime my Democratic brethren make shotgun attacks on any religious group.  It's that kind of thing that allows my Christian brethren on the other side of the political spectrum to label us godless humanists and worse and get away with it.

I became a born-again Christian in 1969 and by 1976 had discovered the Christian Reconstructionist writings of R.J. Rushdoony, who was a presbyterian, but was not a fundamentalist or a rapturist or a charismatic. Rushdoony believed (he died in his 80s a couple years ago) that a Christian is as a Christian does, that is, you practice what you preach.  I think he'd be a Democrat today.

It is true Rushdoony's writings became more known after 1973, because he wrote that Christianity should be relevant to all of life, including politics, but also things like the arts and architecture and everything else.

Around 1973, American evangelicalism started to awake from what I will call a fundamentalist slumber in which culture had been abandoned since around 1920, because all that was considered important during those 50+ years was getting people saved from the flames of hell.  American evangelicalism was re-introduced to the cultural implications of the Christian gospel by issues like abortion and home-schooling.  The Republicans were more discerning of the potential strength of these issues than the Democrats and started putting appealing planks in their platform on such issues in 1980 with Reagan.  But nothing significant was ever done, and the power elites remained in control of the candidates and the money on the Republican side, just as before. 

 

Newt Gingrich's takeover in 1994 had nothing to do with Christian values, although his movement conned many Christians to support it.  The only issue since 1994 on which the Christian Right has had any influence was knee-jerk support for Israel, because of the Rapturist view of end-times.  In this connection, I will have to agree with Mr. Bageant’s statement, “The pseudo-scriptural has become an apocalyptic game plan for earthly political action: To wit, the messiah can only return to earth after an apocalypse in Israel called Armageddon, which the fundamentalists are promoting with all their power so that The Rapture can take place.”  That essentially is the rapturist view, except that not all Fundamentalists are rapturists.

 

The pro-lifers on the Republican side have been content with a plank supporting them although nothing has been done in the 30+ years since Roe v. Wade.  Democrats have missed the boat by failing to point out to the pro-lifers that both parties are really pro-choice, but only one of them (us) has been honest about it.

Again, Rushdoony and his Reconstructionist movement was not Rapturist, but postmillennial.  The "postmill" view had nothing to do with supporting Israel vs. Arab countries and hastening armageddon.  The main distinctive of the "postmill" view was optimism and that Christians should be about improving the culture in every way, including any political party in which one was involved.

People like Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and most fundamentalists and Rapturists rarely missed a chance to distance themselves from Rushdoony and Christian Reconstruction.  Rushdoony and Reconstruction would have called them to live too consistently and less hypocritically as Christians. Rushdoony and Christian Reconstruction would have urged them to take care of the poor, instead of aligning themselves politically with the rich power elites in the Republican Party.

People miss the point of Rushdoony and Christian Reconstruction by nit-picking about strange fringe issues perceived by modern culture as draconian in the Bible and asking, "What about this?"  Bill Moyers interviewed Rushdoony on a TV special 20 years ago and asked him whether he'd implement all the Old Testament moral laws.  Rushdoony's
presuppositional position was -- how can any creature improve on God?  But he saw Moyers' trap and said, "No, I wouldn't, because I'm a sinner...."  The prospect of a restored Edenic world order overwhelmed even Rushdoony, who nevertheless dreamed of such things.

All this ranting about Old Testament stoning is an example of such misguided nit-picking.  But let's take a positive example of a Biblical worldview and see how it applied when this country was founded and still does.  The Old Testament jubilee principle said, basically, all debts are forgiven every 7 years.  Now, don't get me wrong -- I'm not saying it was ever followed, even in Biblical history.  Just as it was against the law to murder, when King David had Bathsheeba's husband killed, but there was no one available to
punish him.  And I won't argue that implementing that now would not cause vast disruptions in our banking industry today.  But there was a principle there -- debts should be forgiven every 7 years.  The founding fathers were Biblically literate and familiar with that principle, so they put bankruptcy in the constitution.  And it remains our law that bankruptcy liquidation cannot be taken but once every 7 years.  Not everybody does it, otherwise no one would lend any money in the 6th year.  But for those who are hopelessly buried in debt and can never repay it, the law is there as blessed relief to
them.


Pointing out such parallels was what Rushdoony and Reconstruction were all about.  Parallels that would improve life for all, not just Christians.


*Attorney/Mediator/Arbitrator
Taylor County Democratic Chair
Writer/Editor/Consultant
3929 N 11th St. (deliveries)
POB 3311 (mail)
Abilene, Tx 79604
(325) 677-4343
Fax 677-5552

Dave@Haigler.Clearwire.net